2007年11月6日 星期二

YOU CAN'T RETIRE IN SINGAPORE

Not for most under current scheme which a couple expect themselves to work until 62 year old, pay off a HDB flat with CPF, and then rely on money in the CPF Special Account plus savings in the bank to last for the rest of their life.

I estimate that up to 95% of families in Singapore can't afford retirement.

CURRENT DATA, ASSUMPTIONS & SCENARIOS

The 2006 median family's monthly income in Singapore is S$4500 (combined income of 2 or more earners).

Employed Households by Monthly Household Income from Work (source: Singapore Department of Statistics, Feb 2007):

Monthly Household Income from Work (S$): Per cent
Less than 1000: 5.7%
1000 – 1,999: 13.0%
2,000 – 2,999: 13.6%
3,000 – 3,999: 12.3%
4,000 – 4,999: 10.5%
5,000 – 5,999: 9.0%
6,000 – 6,999: 7.0%
7,000 – 7,999: 5.4%
8,000 – 8,999: 4.3%
9,000 – 9,999: 3.3%
10,000 and above: 15.8%

Let's assume that a typical Median Income couple at retirement age:

  • Married at age 25 and thereafter work continuously for 37 years;
  • Each received 12 months salary plus 13th month bonus every year;
  • Salaries either remain or increase but never drop;
  • No income disruption as a result of lost of employment due to retrenchment, illnesses or handicap;
  • Final 7 years's average income is S$4500 per month (Final Monthly Income); average monthly salary in the first decade of work is half the Final Monthly Income; average monthly salary in the second decade of work is two-third of Final Monthly Income; average monthly salary in the third decade of work is three quarter of Final Monthly Income;
  • Save 13th month bonus minus CPF contribution every year;
  • Monthly cash balance is negligible;
  • No net inflation (i.e. income always caught up over overtook inflation)
  • Employer CPF contribution is on top of the Income mentioned
  • Pay off the HDB apartment through CPF Ordinary Account by retirement;
  • Medishield would look after all medical needs;
  • Family retirement fund comprises of monies in Savings plus CPF Special Account only;
  • Have S$163K by 62 year old, based on current CPF Special Account contribution structure and interest rate;
  • Savings Account Rate is less than 1% per annum (based on rate in the past decade);
  • Retirement Fund needs to last until at least 85 year old (or 23 years after retirement).

Base Case Retirement Scenario

Based on the above data and assumption, For a Median Income Family, the savings in the bank will amount to approximately S$108K, and balance in the CPF special account, S$163K. So, after 37 years of hand-to-mouth living, the couple will retire with less than S$275K to their names. Singaporean will agree that a couple will need at minimum, S$2K/month or S$24K/year for living. In this scenario, the retirement fund will exhaust within 11 years. This means, either the retiree couple would die with food in stomach before 73 or starve to death without food in stomach by 74.

Alternative Scenario I

An improved scenario would have the couple put every dime that they save every year in CPF Special Account (or equivalent) that fetches 4% return per annum. The compounded retirement fund would amount to approximately S$193K + S$163K (savings plus CPF contribution respectively) = S$356K. This scenario will allow the couple to live for 14.8 years after retirement – up to 76.8 year old.

Alternative Scenario II

A more aggressive improved scenario would have the couple put every dime that they save every year into investment that fetches average return of 8% per annum (twice as good as CPF Special Account). The compounded retirement fund would amount to approximately S$467K + S$163K (savings plus CPF contribution respectively) = S$630K (savings plus CPF contribution). This scenario will allow the couple to live for 26.3 years after retirement – up to 88.3 year old.

Likely Improved Scenario

The likely improved scenario would be in between Base Case, Alternative I and Alternative II scenarios.
To provide for rainy days, the couple kept the first S$10K in bank that bears next to zero interest. This S$10K would take at least the first 5 years of savings. The next S$20K of savings into fixed deposit that gives 2% interest. The next S$20K is at least savings from the next 7 years. Subsequent 20 years of savings will be invested in more aggressive fund with capital guarantee; which typically yields no more than 6% per annum. With 12 or more years of yield lower than 4%, lower total amount in investment less aggressive than 8% per annum return, such median income couple would likely have about S$10.5K + S$35K + S$81K + S$163K = S$289.5K (Savings Account plus Fixed Deposit Account plus Investment plus CPF Special Account respectively) for retirement. The amount could only last between12 years after retirement. That means even with investment, the median couple is unlikely to survive beyond 74 year old. Those below median income will definitely be worse.

CONCLUSION

To survive until 85 year old on annual allowance of S$24K, a couple will need S$552K as the minimum fund for a humble retirement -- it was shown on Straits Times that to retire a Singapore family needs more than S$2M.

Based on the Likely Improved Scenario investment pattern, even family with S$10K per month (top 15th percentile families) cannot retire because such family will only have S$10.5K + S$35K + S$180K + S$163K = S$388.5K (Savings Account plus Fixed Deposit Account plus Investment plus CPF Special Account respectively) for retirement.

Only family with monthly income of S$20K per month and above could afford to retire. The average annual household income of 91st to 100th (highest 10 deciles) is S$174.3K, so may be only the top 5 deciles family could afford retirement.

DISCLAIMER
This modeling of course could not take into account life style, spending pattern, the ability of family members being employed for 32 years without income drop, inflation, and better investment return. Although, only the top 10 deciles families may have spare cash for more aggressive and hence better return investment.

This model also could not determine what amount is enough for families who could afford more than minimum requirement.

2007年11月2日 星期五

Extract from 中時電子報 2007/11/01 04:49

世界經濟論壇(WEF)昨日公布最新全球競爭力評比,二○○七年全球競爭力排名,在一三一個受評國家中,美國競爭力仍高居第一,其他依序是瑞士、丹麥瑞典德國芬蘭 新加坡日本、英國、荷蘭等。前十名中,北歐國家就占了三國,且進步最多的是瑞典,由去年第九名上升至第四名. 台灣的排名第十四名,較去年滑落一名;南韓今年競爭力大躍進,由去年第廿三名進步為今年的十一名,在主要國家中名次進步最多。
 
世界經濟論壇「全球競爭力」指標由三大類、十二項及一一三個細項組成,三大指標包括「基本需要」、「效率增強」及「創新因素」等。

台灣在金融市場成熟度由去年四十七名滑落到五十八名,退步的幅度最大;其中,銀行健全度由去年第一百名,滑落為今年的第一一四名。
 
其次,在「總體經濟」指標方面,台灣滑落四名為第廿六名,主要是財政赤字排名第五十九名,政府債務第五十三名,這幾項排名落後,大大影響總體排名。 台灣在「體制」方面退步七名為第三十七名,包括小股東權益的保護(排名第六十九),大眾對政治人物的信賴(排名第五十七)、司法獨立(第五十三名)等細項的排名均落後, 無論在財政赤字、還是政府債務,及對政治人物信賴方面,台灣都大幅落後,影響總體排名。
 
台灣向來表現較好的「創新因素」,今年亦退步三名,排名第十,其中,企業成熟度排名退步一名,排名第十四;創新指標方面,退步三名,排名第九。此外,在「商業競爭力」指數排名,台灣今年亦退步四名,自第十九名滑落至第廿三名,其中包括公司營運與策略成熟度滑落六名,國家商業環境品質滑落四名。